GRB 040106
GCN Circular 2527
Subject
GRB 040106 : Planned XMM-Newton observation
Date
2004-02-23T17:20:56Z (22 years ago)
From
Norbert Schartel at XMM-Newton/ESA <too@xmm.vilspa.esa.es>
XMM-Newton will observe GRB 040223 at location
(RA=16h 39m 34s, DEC=-41d 55' 45", J2000),
starting at 17:43:40 UT, on February 23, 2004,
for an exposure of 45300 seconds.
GCN Circular 2521
Subject
GRB040106, follow-up radio observations
Date
2004-01-21T23:11:56Z (23 years ago)
From
Dale A. Frail at NRAO <dfrail@nrao.edu>
D. A. Frail (NRAO), M. Wieringa (ATNF) and A. M. Soderberg (Caltech)
report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
"On 2004 Jan. 21.48 UT we carried out follow-up observations with the
VLA centered on the XMM X-ray source (GCN# 2508,2512) within the
INTEGRAL error circle (GCN#2505). We did not detect the ATCA radio
source claimed earlier (GCN#2516) in the preliminary XMM error circle.
The VLA flux density limits at the position of the revised XMM error
circle (GCN#2520) are 4 +/- 50 microJy and -77 +/- 85 microJy, at 8.46
and 4.86 GHz, respectively.
No further observations are planned."
GCN Circular 2520
Subject
GRB040106: refined X-ray transient position
Date
2004-01-21T17:24:04Z (23 years ago)
From
Darach Watson at U.of Copenhagen <darach@astro.ku.dk>
J. A. Tedds (University of Leicester) and D. Watson (University of
Copenhagen) report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
The XMM-Newton EPIC coordinates were refined by matching the X-ray sources
in the field to the USNO-A2 catalogue. The cross-correlation is extremely
good and yields a final source position (J2000) for the X-ray afterglow of
RA: 11 52 12.43, Dec: -46 47 15.9
The 1 sigma error radius is 0.7" (including the residual 0.5" systematic
error from the correlation that is observed in the 1XMM catalogue).
This is not precisely consistent with the position of the fading optical
source reported by Masetti et al. (GCN 2515). However we note that the
position of the star listed as #4 in the image provided by Masetti et al.,
which corresponds to the USNO-B1 source 0432-0297902 and the relative
position of another star in the field (USNO-B1 0432-0297908), both imply a
shift of ~1" in their coordinates in R.A. Correcting for this shift we find
the optical transient position consistent with the XMM-Newton position given
above. This position is not coincident with that of the radio source
reported by Wieringa & Frail (GCN 2516).
GCN Circular 2516
Subject
GRB040106, Radio Observations
Date
2004-01-13T17:08:54Z (23 years ago)
From
Alicia Soderberg at Caltech <ams@astro.caltech.edu>
M. Wieringa and D. A. Frail (NRAO) report on behalf of a larger
collaboration:
"Beginning at 2004 Jan. 10 14:15 UT we carried out an observation at a
frequency of 8.6 GHz with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA)
centered on the bright XMM X-ray source (GCN# 2508,2512) within the
INTEGRAL error circle (GCN#2505). A 160 uJy radio source was detected
with 5-sigma significance 1.8 arcsec from center of the XMM error
circle at (epoch J2000), R.A.=11:52:13.16, Dec.=-46:47:11.3, with an
uncertainty of +/-0.5 arcsec. This radio source is not coincident with
any of the optical sources reported earlier (GCN#'s 2509,2511,2514 and
2515).
Further observations are planned."
GCN Circular 2515
Subject
GRB040106, likely optical afterglow
Date
2004-01-09T18:16:40Z (23 years ago)
From
Evert Rol at U.Amsterdam <evert@science.uva.nl>
Nicola Masetti, Eliana Palazzi (IASF/CNR, Bologna), Evert Rol, Elena
Pian (INAF, OA Trieste) and Emanuela Pompei (ESO) on behalf of GRACE,
report:
We have observed the Integral error circle of GRB 040106 (Mereghetti
et al., GCN 2505), on two consecutive nights (6-7 and 7-8 Jan 2004) at
the ESO NTT with EMMI in R band.
Within the error circle of the XMM-Newton counterpart (Ehle et al.,
GCN 2508), we find only one source which shows a clear fading
behaviour, as follows:
mid obsdate, UT filter exptime magnitude err(magn)
07/01/04, 08:33 R 10 min 22.4 0.1
08/01/04, 08:25 R 20 min 23.7 (*) 0.3
* 2 sigma detection
The magnitudes are calibrated using the USNO-A2.0 star U0375_14656270,
located at coordinates RA = 11:52:18.18, Dec = -46:46:54.3 (J2000),
assuming it has magnitude R = 17.1. The magnitude errors are
statistical only, i.e. they do not include any zero point errors.
All other sources within the XMM-Newton error circle show no sign of
fading, confirming the findings by Fox et al. (GCN 2514). We therefore
identify the fading source as the likely optical afterglow of GRB
040106.
The position of the afterglow is
RA = 11 52 12.27 (J2000)
Dec = -46 47 15.8 (J2000)
with a 0.5 arcsecond error in both coordinates.
The NTT images can be viewed at
http://www.bo.iasf.cnr.it/~masetti/grb040106.html (source 5 in the
images is the afterglow).
Further observations at all wavelengths are encouraged.
GCN Circular 2514
Subject
GRB040106: Second Epoch Optical Observations
Date
2004-01-09T05:21:47Z (23 years ago)
From
Derek Fox at CIT <derekfox@astro.caltech.edu>
D.B. Fox and S.B. Cenko (Caltech) with R. Phelps (NSF) report:
"We have observed the error circle of the Integral GRB 040106
(Mereghetti et al., GCN 2505