GRB 011211
GCN Circular 1311
Subject
GRB011211: HST Observations of Optical Afterglow and Host Galaxy
Date
2002-03-28T06:32:29Z (25 years ago)
From
Derek Fox at CIT <derekfox@astro.caltech.edu>
D.W. Fox, J.S. Bloom, and S.R. Kulkarni (Caltech) report on behalf of
a larger collaboration:
"We have imaged the optical afterglow (GCN 1191) and presumed host
galaxy of GRB011211 (GCN 1215) with the Hubble Space Telescope and
STIS (Clear) instrument for 5133s on December 25.8 UT. The host
galaxy is clearly detected and extends for roughly 0.5 arcsec
northeast of the afterglow.
Our observations confirm the result of Burud et al. (GCN 1213), with
the caveat that the afterglow offset is approximately 0.3 arcsec and
to the southwest rather than the southeast of the host galaxy.
A GIF image of the near field may be found at:
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~derekfox/grb011211/
GCN Circular 1303
Subject
GRB011211 revised BVRI field photometry
Date
2002-03-23T18:57:09Z (25 years ago)
From
Arne A. Henden at USNO/USRA <aah@nofs.navy.mil>
A. Henden (USRA/USNO) reports on behalf of the USNO GRB team:
We have acquired additional BVRcIc all-sky photometry for
an 11x11 arcmin field that is approximately centered on
the position of the optical transient for GRB011211 reported
by Grav et al. (GCN 1191) with the USNOFS 1.0-m telescope.
The field was observed on two more nights,
with the new dataset posted at:
ftp://ftp.nofs.navy.mil/pub/outgoing/aah/grb/grb011211.dat
Stars brighter than V=13.5 are saturated and should be used with care.
The current photometry has a potential external zero-point
error of about one percent. The astrometry in this file
is based on linear plate solutions with respect to USNO-A2.0.
The internal errors are less than 100mas.
The two new nights have shown that the photometry
reported in GCN 1197 has larger error than originally estimated,
most likely caused by a combination of the very poor seeing,
high airmass and approaching dawn. For example, the
comparison star U0675_11427359 that was used by Grav et al.and
Jensen et al. (GCN 1195) to calibrate their field can be found
in the new .dat file with the following magnitudes:
GCN 1195 (Jensen) B = 18.65 V = 18.18 R = 17.90 I = 17.07
GCN 1197 (Henden) B = 18.65 V = 18.11 R = 17.76 I = 17.42
new result B = 18.48 V = 18.00 R = 17.70 I = 17.37
We apologize for the lateness of this correction, but this
winter has had unusually few photometric nights. This is
the first case in several dozen calibrations that we have
performed for the GRB community in which the final dataset
differed from the initial dataset by more than a couple of percent.
GCN Circular 1215
Subject
GRB011211: BeppoSAX/GRBM data
Date
2002-01-07T18:45:54Z (25 years ago)
From
Filippo Frontera at ITESRE CNR <filippo@tesre.bo.cnr.it>
F.Frontera, Physics Dept. University of Ferrara, Ferrara and Istituto
Astrofisica Spaziale and Fisica Cosmica (IASF), CNR, Bologna; L. Amati,
IASF, CNR, Bologna; C. Guidorzi and E. Montanari, Physics Dept,
University of Ferrara; E. Costa, M. Feroci, L. Piro, IASF, CNR, Rome; J.
Heise, Space Research Organization Netherlands (SRON), Utrecht; and J.J.M.
in 't Zand, Astronomical Institute and SRON, Utrecht, report:
With reference to the GRB011211(=XRF011211) (GCN 1188, 1189