GRB 230409B
GCN Circular 33627
Subject
GRB 230409B: 3.6m DOT near-infrared detection, afterglow confirmation
Date
2023-04-15T08:39:33Z (3 years ago)
From
Rahul Gupta at ARIES, India <rahulbhu.c157@gmail.com>
Rahul Gupta, Amit K. Ror, S. B. Pandey, A. Aryan, K. Misra (ARIES), A. J.
Castro-Tirado (IAA-CSIC), D. Bhattacharya (Ashoka University/IUCAA), and V.
Bhalerao (IITB) report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
GRB 230409B was detected by the Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) at
04:56:57 UT on 9th April 2023 (Beardmore et al., GCN 33592). The prompt
emission mask-weighted BAT light curve consists of a single-peaked
structure with a T90 duration of 9.79 +- 2.59 sec in 15-350 keV energy
range (Palmer et al., GCN 33598). We compare the reported value of BAT
fluence and peak photon flux for this GRB (Palmer et al., GCN 33598) with
all the BAT-detected GRBs sample; this burst is positioned at the
middle-near top of this distribution. We also determine the peak energy of
the burst using BAT energy fluence and peak energy correlation. We
calculated the peak energy of the burst is 61.49 (+23.39, -16.96) KeV; the
softer value of peak energy is consistent with those of long GRBs (Type II).
The Swift XRT detected an X-ray afterglow ~ 101.2 sec after the BAT trigger
(Beardmore et al., GCN 33592). The XRT count-rate light curve could be best
described with a broken power-law model with temporal indices of 0.62
(+0.12, -0.12) and 1.15 (+0.19, -0.18) before and after break time
(~4600-sec post-BAT detection), respectively. As no redshift has been
reported for this source, we modeled the late time time-averaged XRT
spectrum (T0 + 18528 to 113195 sec) considering redshift = 2, roughly
average redshift value for long GRBs (Type II). The spectrum could be
modeled using an absorption power-law with the following spectral
parameters: NH_host= 4.85 (-4.85,+8.76) X 10^{22} cm^{-2} and \beta_x= 0.73
(-0.36,+0.40). Considering the adiabatic deceleration without energy
injection, closure relations indicate that the late time X-ray afterglow
could be best described with \nu_m < \nu < \nu_c spectral regime for ISM
medium for the electron energy index p ~ 2.46.
The Swift UVOT detected a weak fading source within the XRT error circle
(Kuin et al., GCN 33595). We performed the follow-up observations of this
fading optical source using the TANSPEC mounted at the axial port of the
3.6m Devasthal Optical Telescope (DOT) of ARIES Nainital at multiple epochs
in J filter (near-infrared). We report the preliminary brightness of the
afterglow to be J = 20.1 +/- 0.3 mag ~ 0.75 days after the BAT trigger. We
obtained the limiting mag of 20.5 mag ~ 2.7 days post-burst at successive
epochs. Our observations confirm this fading source to be the afterglow of
GRB 230409B.
The magnitude values reported are calibrated against 2MASS nearby stars.
This circular may be cited. 3.6m Devasthal Optical Telescope (DOT) is the
recently commissioned facility in the Northern Himalayan region of India
(long:79 41 04E, lat:29 21 40N, alt:2540m) owned and operated by the
Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES), Nainital (
https://www.aries.res.in). Authors of this GCN circular thankfully
acknowledge consistent support from the staff members to run and maintain
the 3.6m DOT. We also thank Director ARIES for approving the DDT slot for
the ToO observations.
GCN Circular 33608
Subject
GRB 230409B: Mondy optical upper limit
Date
2023-04-12T23:21:33Z (3 years ago)
From
Alexei Pozanenko at IKI, Moscow <apozanen@iki.rssi.ru>
S. Belkin (IKI), E. Klunko (ISTP), A. Pozanenko (IKI), N. Pankov (HSE)
report on behalf of GRB IKI FuN:
We observed the field of Swift GRB 230409B (Beardmore et al., GCN 33592)
with AZT-33IK telescope of Mondy observatory in R-filter on 2023-04-09
starting (UT) 14:52:05. We do not detect the optical counterpart (Kuin
et al., GCN 33595) within the enhanced Swift/XRT error box (Evans et
al., GCN 33594). Preliminary photometry of a stacked image is following
Date UT start t-T0 Exp. Filter OT Err. UL(3sigma)
(mid, days) (s)
2023-04-09 14:52:05 0.42231 26*60 R n/d n/d 20.5
The photometry is based on nearby USNO-B1.0 stars.
USNO-B1.0
RA DEC R2
21:58:01.9195200 +52:49:21.982800 15.15
21:58:13.7054400 +52:48:57.002400 15.56
21:57:54.5028000 +52:50:57.080400 15.95
The upper limit does not contradict result reported by Adami et al. (GCN
33607).
GCN Circular 33607
Subject
GRB 230409B: OHP/T193 optical upper limit
Date
2023-04-12T13:30:17Z (3 years ago)
From
Benjamin Schneider at MIT <bschn@mit.edu>
C. Adami (LAM), B. Schneider (MIT), S. Basa (LAM),
E. Le Floc'h, D. Turpin, D. G��tz (CEA Paris-Saclay),
S. D. Vergani (GEPI, Obs. de Paris), report on behalf
of a larger collaboration:
We observed the field of GRB 230409B (Beardmore et al., GCN 33592)
using the T193cm telescope at Observatoire de Haute-Provence (France)
equipped with the MISTRAL spectro-imager. Four exposures were obtained
in the i-band (2x300s + 2x600s) from 2023 10 April 03:03:03 UT to
2023 10 April 03:44:17 UT (mid time ~22.3h after trigger). In the combined
frame, we do not detect any source at the position reported by Evans et al.,
GCN 33594 and Kuin et al., GCN 33595 down to the following 3-sigma limit:
i > 20.6 mag (AB)
The photometric calibration was performed using nearby stars from
the PanSTARRS catalog and the magnitude is not corrected for Galactic
extinction.
We acknowledge the excellent support from Observatoire de Haute-Provence,
in particular Jean-Pierre Troncin.
GCN Circular 33599
Subject
GRB 230409B: Swift-XRT refined Analysis
Date
2023-04-09T21:57:51Z (3 years ago)
From
Phil Evans at U of Leicester <pae9@leicester.ac.uk>
P. D'Avanzo (INAF-OAB), M.G. Bernardini (INAF-OAB), E. Ambrosi
(INAF-IASFPA) , D.N. Burrows (PSU), J. D. Gropp (PSU), S. Dichiara
(PSU), J.P. Osborne (U. Leicester), K.L. Page (U. Leicester) and A.P.
Beardmore report on behalf of the Swift-XRT team:
We have analysed 6.6 ks of XRT data for GRB 230409B (Beardmore et al.
GCN Circ. 33592), from 338 s to 52.1 ks after the BAT trigger. The
data comprise 19 s in Windowed Timing (WT) mode with the remainder in
Photon Counting (PC) mode. The enhanced XRT position for this burst was
given by Evans et al. (GCN Circ. 33594).
The light curve can be modelled with a power-law decay with a decay
index of alpha=0.87 (+0.04, -0.03).
A spectrum formed from the PC mode data can be fitted with an absorbed
power-law with a photon spectral index of 1.97 (+0.22, -0.21). The
best-fitting absorption column is 1.23 (+0.27, -0.24) x 10^22 cm^-2,
in excess of the Galactic value of 7.6 x 10^21 cm^-2 (Willingale et al.
2013). The counts to observed (unabsorbed) 0.3-10 keV flux conversion
factor deduced from this spectrum is 5.2 x 10^-11 (9.9 x 10^-11) erg
cm^-2 count^-1.
A summary of the PC-mode spectrum is thus:
Total column: 1.23 (+0.27, -0.24) x 10^22 cm^-2
Galactic foreground: 7.6 x 10^21 cm^-2
Excess significance: 3.3 sigma
Photon index: 1.97 (+0.22, -0.21)
If the light curve continues to decay with a power-law decay index of
0.87, the count rate at T+24 hours will be 0.020 count s^-1,
corresponding to an observed (unabsorbed) 0.3-10 keV flux of 1.1 x
10^-12 (2.0 x 10^-12) erg cm^-2 s^-1.
The results of the XRT-team automatic analysis are available at
http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/01163401.
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 33598
Subject
GRB 230409B: Swift-BAT refined analysis
Date
2023-04-09T17:50:01Z (3 years ago)
From
Amy Lien at GSFC <amy.y.lien@nasa.gov>
D. M. Palmer (LANL), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC),
A. P. Beardmore (U Leicester), H. A. Krimm (NSF),
S. Laha (GSFC/UMBC), A. Y. Lien (U Tampa),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC), T. Parsotan (GSFC/UMBC),
T. Sakamoto (AGU), M. Stamatikos (OSU)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
Using the data set from T-240 to T+962 sec from the recent telemetry
downlink, we report further analysis of BAT GRB 230409B (trigger #1163401)
(Beardmore et al., GCN Circ. 33592