GRB 140801A
GCN Circular 16667
Subject
GRB 140801A: AAO optical observations
Date
2014-08-04T01:38:25Z (12 years ago)
From
Alexei Pozanenko at IKI, Moscow <apozanen@iki.rssi.ru>
A. Volnova (IKI), R. Inasaridze (AAO), Molotov (KIAM), A. Pozanenko (IKI)
report on behalf of larger GRB follow-up collaboration:
We observed the field of GRB 140801A (Pelassa, GCN 16658) with AS-32 (0.7m)
telescope of Abastumani Observatory starting on Aug. 02 (UT) 21:54:52. We
obtained several unfiltered frames under of 60 s under average FWHM of 2.0
arcsec. The optical afterglow (Gorbovskoy et al., GCN 16653; Xu et al., GCN
16656, Masi, GCN 16659) is well detected on the stacked image.
Details of a photometry of the GRB 140801A are following:
date UT start t-T0 Filter Exp. OT err
(mid, days) (s)
2014-08-02 21:54:52 1.14962 None 26*60 22.13 0.18
The photometry is based on the USNO-B1 star ((J2000) 02:56:16.58 +30:57:02.1
assuming R = 16.06) suggested by Moskvitin et al., (GCN 16663). Our
photometry does not contradict un-broken decay of a light curve of GRB
140801A (Kann et al., GCN 16666).
GCN Circular 16666
Subject
GRB 140801A: GROND Afterglow detection, unbroken decay
Date
2014-08-03T22:14:51Z (12 years ago)
From
Alexander Kann at TLS Tautenburg <kann@tls-tautenburg.de>
D. A. Kann (TLS Tautenburg), C. Delvaux, and J. Greiner (both MPE
Garching) report on behalf of the GROND team:
We observed the field of GRB 140801A (Fermi trigger 428612396; Pelassa,
GCN #16658) simultaneously in g'r'i'z'JHK with GROND (Greiner et al. 2008,
PASP 120, 405) mounted at the 2.2 m MPG telescope at ESO La Silla
Observatory (Chile).
Observations started at 09:43 UT on 2014-08-02, 0.61 days after the GRB
trigger. They were performed at an average seeing of 1".5 and at an
average airmass of 2.1.
Based on images with exposure times of 1584 s in g'r'i'z', we detect the
optical afterglow at the MASTER position reported by Gorbovskoy et al.
(GCN #16653) at the following AB magnitudes:
g' = 22.4 +/- 0.1 mag,
r' = 21.9 +/- 0.1 mag,
i' = 21.8 +/- 0.1 mag, and
z' = 21.2 +/- 0.2 mag.
Observations taken a day later show the afterglow to have decayed by about
0.75 magnitudes. The afterglow continues to decay with a slope of ~0.9 in
comparison to the magnitudes given by Xu et al. (GCN #16656