GRB 120521C
GCN Circular 13348
Subject
GRB 120521C redshift estimate
Date
2012-05-29T22:22:31Z (14 years ago)
From
Nial Tanvir at U.Leicester <nrt3@star.le.ac.uk>
N. R. Tanvir, K. Wiersema (U. Leicester), A. J. Levan (U. Warwick),
A. Cucchiara (UCSC/UCO Lick), D. Perley (Caltech), P. Hirst (Gemini),
T. Carroll, T. Kerr, W. Varricatt (JACH), C. Farina, M. Hrudkova (ING),
L. Ker (Edinburgh) report on behalf of a larger collaboration:
We have combined observations of GRB 120521C (Baumgartner et al. GCN
13318) made using the WHT (Levan et al., GCN 13322), Keck (Perley et al. GCN
13332), UKIRT and Gemini-N telescopes across the optical-IR region in r,i,z,J,H,K.
Analysis of further WHT z-band imaging, obtained at 01:54 UT, 2 hours
after our initial epoch (Levan et al. GCN 13322) shows a faint source
within the XRT error circle. This source is also seen at high confidence
in z-band imaging obtained with Gemini-N at 07:03 UT, and photometry
shows that it brightened by 0.5 magnitudes over this period, suggesting
it is the afterglow of GRB 120521C. This source is only very weakly visible in
contemporaneous I-band imaging obtained with Keck (Perley et al. GCN
13332), and this indicates a red colour i-z >2.3 . However, the source is not
detected in our initial reductions of the UKIRT WFCAM imaging in JHK,
suggesting that z-K < 1.3 (AB, corresponding to f(nu) ~ nu^-beta with
beta<1.3). This is indicative of a high-redshift, rather than a highly
reddened afterglow. We note that the position of the afterglow candidate
in our data matches the radio position reported by Zauderer et al (GCN 13344)
within our calibration uncertainty of ~0.3 arcseconds.
Gemini-North GMOS spectroscopy was obtained in poor conditions, using the
R400 grating centered at 8000 A, giving a wavelength range of
approximately 5850-10100 A. Observations (2 x 1800 s) started at 12:03 UT
on 23 May 2012. We used the GMOS Nod&Shuffle observing mode to improve
skyline subtraction.
In the resulting spectrum, a weak trace is seen at the expected location,
which is only detected redward of ~8700 A. The absence of any emission
bluewards of this wavelength is suggestive of a high redshift of this
source, z~6.0. The low signal of the trace precludes detection of
absorption lines.
Further analysis of the data is ongoing.
GCN Circular 13344
Subject
GRB 120521C: EVLA Localization of Afterglow
Date
2012-05-25T21:39:06Z (14 years ago)
From
Ashley Zauderer at CfA <bevinashley@gmail.com>
A. Zauderer, E. Berger and T. Laskar (Harvard) report on behalf of a
larger collaboration:
"Further to GCN 13343, we note that the EVLA 21.8 GHz brightening source
within the XRT enhanced error circle of GRB 120521C (GCNs 13318, 13324)
is located at (J2000):
RA: 14:17:08.802 (+/- 0.002)
Dec: +42:08:41.22 (+/- 0.02).
This position appears to be offset from the two galaxies at the edge of
the Swift-XRT error circle based on the image provided by Perley et al.
in GCN 13332."
GCN Circular 13343
Subject
GRB 120521C: EVLA 22 GHz Detection
Date
2012-05-25T15:16:06Z (14 years ago)
From
Ashley Zauderer at CfA <bevinashley@gmail.com>
A. Zauderer and E. Berger (Harvard) report on behalf of a larger
collaboration:
"We re-observed the position of GRB 120521C (GCN 13318) on 2012 May
23.12 UT (1.15 d after the burst) with the EVLA at 21.8 GHz. Within
the enhanced Swift-XRT error circle (GCN 13324) we detect a brightening
radio source with a flux density that is about a factor of two above our
early 3-sigma limit of 50 uJy (GCN 13336). We conclude that this is the
radio afterglow of GRB 120521C. Follow-up observations at multiple
frequencies are in progress."
GCN Circular 13337
Subject
GRB 120521C: Early Tautenburg limits
Date
2012-05-22T22:17:24Z (14 years ago)
From
Alexander Kann at TLS Tautenburg <kann@tls-tautenburg.de>
D. A. Kann, B. Stecklum and U. Laux (TLS Tautenburg) report:
We observed to position of Swift GRB 120521C (Trigger 522656, Baumgartner
et al., GCN 13318) with the TLS 1.34m Schmidt telescope. Conditions were
mediocre, with good seeing but bad transparency. Observations were
triggered manually and began 28 minutes after the trigger (17 minutes
after the alert). We obtained 5 x 60 s images in Rc, 4 x 180 s images also
in Rc, and 1 x 600 s each in Z and Ic. The Ic image is affected in depth
by passing clouds.
At the position of the enhanced X-ray afterglow (Beardmore et al., GCN
13324), we do not detect any source, in agreement with earlier results
(Klotz et al., GCN 13319; Bersier et al., GCN 13320; De Cia et al., GCN
13321; Levan et al., GCN 13322; Jelinek et al., GCN 13323; Morgan et al.,
GCN 13325; Gorbovskoy et al., GCN 13329; Oates et al., GCN 13331). The
possible host galaxy (Perley et al., GCN 13332) is not detected.
We us the SDSS star at RA, Dec. (J2000) = 14:17:02.836, +42:6:07.62
(214.26181759, 42.10211787, catalog ID 1237661874023500000) as a
comparison star. Using the transformations of Lupton (2005), we find Rc =
18.33, Ic = 17.93 and Z = 17.78 for this star.
We find the following 2 sigma limiting magnitudes:
Time (days) Exposure (s) Filter UL
0.019827 1 x 60 Rc 21.0
0.022275 5 x 60 Rc 21.8
0.027171 1 x 180 Rc 21.5
0.030760 4 x 180 Rc 22.5
0.040247 1 x 600 Z 20.2
0.048757 1 x 600 Ic 19.3
We note that while the non-detections we as well as other telescopes have
found point to this being a dark GRB, the X-ray absorption seen by Swift
is small. The Keck detection of a possible host galaxy in g' band likely
rules out a high-z interpretation, though.
No further observations are planned.
This message may be cited.
GCN Circular 13336
Subject
GRB 120521C: EVLA 22 GHz Upper Limit
Date
2012-05-22T21:57:19Z (14 years ago)
From
Ashley Zauderer at CfA <bevinashley@gmail.com>
A. Zauderer and E. Berger (Harvard) report on behalf of a larger
collaboration:
"We observed the position of GRB 120521C (GCN 13318) beginning 2012 May
22.12 (3.6 hours after the burst) with the EVLA. At a mean frequency of
21.8 GHz, we find no significant radio emission within the refined
Swift-XRT error circle (GCN 13324) to a 3-sigma limit of ~50 uJy."
GCN Circular 13334
Subject
GRB 120521C: Swift-XRT refined Analysis
Date
2012-05-22T13:46:05Z (14 years ago)
From
Phil Evans at U of Leicester <pae9@star.le.ac.uk>
M.C. Stroh (PSU), D.N. Burrows (PSU), P.A. Evans (U. Leicester), O.M.
Littlejohns (U. Leicester), J.P. Osborne (U. Leicester), A. Maselli
(INAF-IASFPA), V. Mangano (INAF-IASFPA), A. Melandri (INAF-OAB), J.A.
Kennea (PSU) and W.H. Baumgartner report on behalf of the Swift-XRT
team:
We have analysed 7.2 ks of XRT data for GRB 120521C (Baumgartner et
al. GCN Circ. 13318), from 59 s to 29.2 ks after the BAT trigger. The
data comprise 101 s in Windowed Timing (WT) mode (the first 8 s were
taken while Swift was slewing) with the remainder in Photon Counting
(PC) mode. The enhanced XRT position for this burst was given by
Beardmore et al. (GCN. Circ 13324).
The light curve can be modelled with an initial power-law decay with an
index of alpha=2.78 (+0.19, -0.17), followed by a break at T+489 s to
an alpha of 0.51 (+0.11, -0.10).
A spectrum formed from the PC mode data can be fitted with an absorbed
power-law with a photon spectral index of 1.78 (+0.25, -0.16). The
best-fitting absorption column is consistent with the Galactic value
of 1.0 x 10^20 cm^-2 (Kalberla et al. 2005). The counts to observed
(unabsorbed) 0.3-10 keV flux conversion factor deduced from this
spectrum is 3.9 x 10^-11 (4.0 x 10^-11) erg cm^-2 count^-1.
A summary of the PC-mode spectrum is thus:
Total column: 0 (+4.2, -0) x 10^20 cm^-2
Galactic foreground: 1.0 x 10^20 cm^-2
Excess significance: <1.6 sigma
Photon index: 1.78 (+0.25, -0.16)
The results of the XRT-team automatic analysis are available at
http://www.swift.ac.uk/xrt_products/00522656.
This circular is an official product of the Swift-XRT team.
GCN Circular 13333
Subject
GRB 120521C: Swift-BAT refined analysis
Date
2012-05-22T13:27:34Z (14 years ago)
From
Scott Barthelmy at NASA/GSFC <scott@lheamail.gsfc.nasa.gov>
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), W. H. Baumgartner (GSFC/UMBC),
J. R. Cummings (GSFC/UMBC), E. E. Fenimore (LANL), N. Gehrels (GSFC),
H. A. Krimm (GSFC/USRA), D. M. Palmer (LANL), T. Sakamoto (GSFC/UMBC),
G. Sato (ISAS), M. Stamatikos (OSU), J. Tueller (GSFC), T. N. Ukwatta (MSU)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
Using the data set from T-240 to T+962 sec from recent telemetry downlinks,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 120521C (trigger #522656)
(Baumgartner, et al., GCN Circ. 13318). The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 214.288, 42.144 deg, which is
RA(J2000) = 14h 17m 09.1s
Dec(J2000) = +42d 08' 39.8"
with an uncertainty of 1.0 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 67%.
The mask-weighted light curves shows a FRED peak starting at ~T-2 sec,
peaking at ~T+1 sec, abd ending at ~T+40 sec. T90 (15-350 keV) is
26.7 +- 4.4 sec (estimated error including systematics).
The time-averaged spectrum from T-1.03 to T+31.84 sec is best fit by a simple
power-law model. The power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is
1.73 +- 0.11. The fluence in the 15-150 keV band is 1.1 +- 0.1 x 10^-6 erg/cm2.
The 1-sec peak photon flux measured from T-0.02 sec in the 15-150 keV band
is 1.9 +- 0.2 ph/cm2/sec. All the quoted errors are at the 90% confidence
level.
The results of the batgrbproduct analysis are available at
http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/notices_s/522656/BA/
GCN Circular 13332
Subject
GRB 120521C: Keck Observations
Date
2012-05-22T12:59:03Z (14 years ago)
From
Daniel Perley at Caltech <dperley@astro.caltech.edu>
D. A. Perley (Caltech), O. Yaron (Weizmann), Y. Cao, and S. R. Kulkarni
(Caltech) report:
We observed the position of GRB 120521C (Baumgartner et al., GCN 13318)
with the Keck I 10m telescope (+LRIS) starting at 10:39 UT on 2012-05-22.
We acquired a total of 1200s of imaging in I-band and 1360s in g-band.
Seeing conditions were relatively poor (1.5").
At the position of the enhanced XRT error circle (Beardmore et al., GCN
13324) we clearly identify a extended source in both the g-band and I-band
images. It appears to consist of at least two components; a red source at
the southern edge of the XRT error circle and a bluer source at the
western edge of the error circle. The relation of these sources to each
other and to GRB 120521C is not yet clear, but they could represent a
host-galaxy merger system, an afterglow superposed on a host, or two
unrelated galaxies at different redshifts.
The early nondetections of an afterglow (e.g. Klotz et al., GCN 13319;
Bersier et al., GCN 13320