Skip to main content
Testing. You are viewing the public testing version of GCN. For the production version, go to
New Announcement Feature, Code of Conduct, Circular Revisions. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 9740

Swift-BAT trigger 358760 is most likely not a GRB
2009-07-31T17:30:56Z (15 years ago)
Scott Barthelmy at NASA/GSFC <>
T. Sakamoto (GSFC/UMBC), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), W. H. Baumgartner (GSFC/UMBC),
J. R. Cummings (GSFC/UMBC), E. E. Fenimore (LANL), N. Gehrels (GSFC),
H. A. Krimm (GSFC/USRA), C. B. Markwardt (GSFC/UMD), D. M. Palmer (LANL),
A. M. Parsons (GSFC), G. Sato (ISAS), M. Stamatikos (GSFC/ORAU),
B. Sbarufatti (INAF-IASFPA), J. Tueller (GSFC), T. N. Ukwatta (GWU)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):
Using the data set from T-61 to T+242 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of trigger #358760 (Subrufatti, et al., GCN Circ. 9739).
The BAT ground-calculated position is RA, Dec = 189.693, -15.363 deg,
with an uncertainty of 3.3 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
This is 2.7 arcmin from the flight position.  The partial coding was 100%.
This is only a 5.5 sigma detection in the image domain.  The mask-weighted
lightcurve shows a very marginal detection in the 25-100 keV band in a single
64 msec time bin and nothing in the other two energy bands.  There is also
a weak cosmic ray shower during this 64-msec bin.  Given this very maginal
evidence, we do not think this trigger is due to a GRB.  It is very
probably a noise fluctution coupled with a weak CR Shower. However, we can not
rule out a GRB origin.
Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit