Skip to main content
Testing. You are viewing the public testing version of GCN. For the production version, go to
New Announcement Feature, Code of Conduct, Circular Revisions. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 670

Re: GRB000508B : Optical observations
2000-05-16T21:54:56Z (24 years ago)
Brian Lindgren Jensen at U.of Copenhagen <>
GRB 000508B: Optical observations

B. L. Jensen, H. Pedersen, J. Hjorth (U. of Copenhagen),
J. P. U. Fynbo (U. of Aarhus/ESO),
J. Gorosabel, N. Lund (DSRI,Copenhagen),
H. Kjeldsen, F. Grundahl (U. of Aarhus),
C. Zurita, J. Casares (IAC,Tenerife),
C. Sanchez-Fernandez and A.J. Castro-Tirado (LAEFF, Madrid)
report on behalf of a larger European GRB collaboration:

"We have obtained images of the RXTE/IPN error box
reported by Smith et al. (GCN #665) with the 2.56-m
Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT+ALFOSC) on La Palma,
and the 1.54-m Danish Telescope (DK-1.54m+DFOSC) at
La Silla, as follows:

Telescope      Date                  Filter/Exp t. FWHM
NOT       2000 May 10.14 UT (t+32h); I:5x300s;     FWHM=0.8"
DK-1.54m  2000 May 10.17 UT (t+33h); R:3x420s;     FWHM=1.5"
DK-1.54m  2000 May 10.38 UT (t+38h); R:3x420s;     FWHM=1.5"
DK-1.54m  2000 May 12.25 UT (t+83h); R:4x420s;     FWHM=1.3"

We have visually compared the combined May 10 2520s R-band
image with red POSS-II exposure. The three sets of May 10
images have been compared internally, both visually
and using automated routines based on DAOPHOT II/ALLSTAR
PSF-photometry. Additionally, we have compared the
combined May 10 and May 12 R-band images, visually and
through automated routines. We do not, in any of the
comparisons, find any significantly variable objects
down to a 3-sigma mag limit of R~22.5. We do not find
significant variability in the objects noted by Stanek
et al. (GCN #668). An image of the error-box is
posted at "
Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit