Skip to main content
Testing. You are viewing the public testing version of GCN. For the production version, go to
New Announcement Feature, Code of Conduct, Circular Revisions. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 31259

GRB 211106A: XMM-Newton monitoring campaign detections
2021-12-18T02:09:26Z (2 years ago)
Alicia Rouco Escorial at CIERA <>
A. Rouco Escorial, W. Fong, C. D. Kilpatrick, J. Rastinejad, G. Schroeder, A. Nugent (Northwestern), E. Berger (Harvard), and T. Laskar (Radboud) report:

���We initiated our afterglow monitoring campaign, consisting of two EPIC-pn observations, with the XMM-Newton Observatory on the short-duration GRB 211106A (Tohuvavohu et al., GCN #31049) on 2021 November 20 (22:37:51 UT) and 2021 December 8 (19:46:37 UT) UT, with median observation times of ~15 and ~33 days post-trigger. The two XMM-Newton observations were obtained under the Proposal 086286 (PI: Fong), with effective exposure times of ~20 ks and ~47 ks, respectively.

In the combined XMM-Newton dataset, we detect the X-ray counterpart to GRB 211106A at the position:

RA(J2000) = 22h54m20.8s
Dec(J2000) = -53d13m50.9s

with a total positional uncertainty of 1.7 arcsec (dominated by XMM-Newton���s systematic uncertainty). The XMM-Newton position of the X-ray afterglow and the Chandra position reported by Berger et al. (2021, GCN #31145) are consistent with each other within the errors. The afterglow is detected in both epochs at a significance of ~5.5 sigma and ~3.4 sigma, with total net source counts of ~83 and ~73 (0.3-10 keV), respectively.

The XRT, Chandra and XMM-Newton afterglow unabsorbed flux, starting at ~0.5 days post-burst, can be modeled with a single power-law decline characterized by a decay index (F~t^alpha) of alpha=-1.02 (-0.06,+0.05). Additionally, from our jointly spectral fitting of both data sets, we derive an intrinsic neutral hydrogen absorption column of ~1.4E21 cm^2 for z=0.097 (Malasani et al., GCN #31075; Christensen et al., GCN #31075). We obtain higher inferred intrinsic column density for greater presumed source redshifts (Kilpatrick et al., GCNs #31146, #31157).

We thank the XMM-Newton Project Scientist, Norbert Shartel, and staff for the rapid planning and scheduling of these observations.���
Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit