Skip to main content
Testing. You are viewing the public testing version of GCN. For the production version, go to
New Announcement Feature, Code of Conduct, Circular Revisions. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 30381

GRB 210704A: possible local hosts
2021-07-05T18:32:51Z (3 years ago)
Andrew Levan at U.of Leicester <>
A.J. Levan (Radboud), S. Campana (INAF-OAB), D.A. Kann (HETH/IAA-CSIC), P. D'Avanzo (INAF-OAB) report:

���We note that the Swift XRT localisation (D���Ai et al. GCN 30379) of GRB 210704A detected by Fermi-LAT, Fermi-GBM (Kunzweiler et al. GCN 30369, Malacaria et al. GCN 30380), AGILE (Ursi et al. GCN 30722) and AstroSat (Prasad et al. GCN 30378) lies in a significant galaxy overdensity. Of particular note, the source localisation overlaps the galaxy cluster 400d J1036+5713 at z=0.203. Although there are no apparent galaxies within the XRT localisation visible in the PanSTARRS 3pi imaging of the field, there are numerous likely members of this cluster within a few arcseconds. 

Furthermore, an even brighter foreground galaxy WISEA J103604.24+571327.7 lies offset approximately 30��� from the XRT position and has a reported redshift of z=0.0817. This galaxy has I=15.962 +/- 0.007 (and absolute magnitude around -22). Its projected physical offset from the burst position is approximately 45 kpc. Although this offset is significant, the probability of chance alignment remains small.

The burst itself appears dominated by a short-spike, with a fainter tail of emission, and these possible host galaxies are consistent with the hosts and locations of short GRBs (and not of long GRBs). At z=0.203 (or z=0.0817) the isotropic equivalent energy would be E_iso ~ 2e51 erg (or E_iso ~ 3e50 erg at z=0.0817), consistent with SGRBs.

Observations to search for the optical afterglow or possibly rising kilonova emission are strongly encouraged. ���

[GCN OPS NOTE(02Aug21): In the SUBJECT the "200704A" was corrected to "210704A".
In the author list, it should be "P. D'Avanzo", not "P D'Avanzo".
Both z-values given in the 3rd paragraph were listed as 0.0891, but they should be 0.0817.]
Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit