Skip to main content
Testing. You are viewing the public testing version of GCN. For the production version, go to
New Announcement Feature, Code of Conduct, Circular Revisions. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 23911

GRB 190219A: NOT optical afterglow candidate
2019-02-20T11:16:15Z (5 years ago)
Dong Xu at NAOC/CAS <>
D. Xu (NAOC), K.E. Heintz (Univ. of Iceland), D.B. Malesani 
(DAWN/NBI/DTU and DARK/NBI), Z.P. Zhu (NAOC), P. Galindo (NOT), J. Viuho 
(NOT), report on behalf of a larger collaboration:

We observed the field of GRB 190219A (Beardmore et al., GCN 23902) using 
the 2.56-m Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) equipped with the ALFOSC 
camera. Observations started at 01:13:50 UT on 2019-02-20, i.e., 5.58 hr 
after the burst, and we obtained 6x300 s Sloan r-band and 10x200 s 
z-band frames. The weather conditions of the night were bad, with thick 
clouds (which accounts for the large delay of our observations).

Among our data, the z-band images are deeper, and a source is detected 
in the stacked observations, at coordinates (J2000):

R.A. (J2000) = 12:38:30.32
Dec. (J2000) = +76:36:46.62

with a radius uncertainty of ~ 0.2 arcsec, within the enhanced Swift-XRT 
error circle (Beardmore et al., GCN 23907). We measure m(z) = 22.8 �� 0.4 
AB at 6.32 hr post-burst, calibrated against nearby Pan-STARRS stars. 
The source is not detected in the stacked r-band image, down to a 
limiting magnitude of m(r) > 22.5 AB. We note that the detected 
magnitude is fainter than the Pan-STARRS survey limit, and as we lack 
temporal information we cannot comment on variability. We propose this 
object as a candidate counterpart for GRB 191202A, but further 
observations are required to establish variability.
Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit