Skip to main content
Testing. You are viewing the public testing version of GCN. For the production version, go to
New Announcement Feature, Code of Conduct, Circular Revisions. See news and announcements

GCN Circular 15979

GRB 140311B: Swift-BAT refined analysis
2014-03-13T03:07:06Z (10 years ago)
Jay R. Cummings at NASA/GSFC/Swift <>
A. Y. Lien (NASA/UMBC), S. D. Barthelmy (GSFC), W. H. Baumgartner (GSFC/UMBC),
J. R. Cummings (looking), N. Gehrels (GSFC), H. A. Krimm (GSFC/USRA),
C. B. Markwardt (GSFC), D. M. Palmer (LANL), T. Sakamoto (AGU),
M. Stamatikos (OSU), J. Tueller (GSFC), T. N. Ukwatta (MSU)
(i.e. the Swift-BAT team):

Using the data set from T-0 to T+3 sec from the recent telemetry downlink,
we report further analysis of BAT GRB 140311B (trigger #591392)
(Racusin, et al., GCN Circ. 15945).  The BAT ground-calculated position is
RA, Dec = 252.333, +52.733 deg which is
    RA(J2000)  =  16h 49m 20.0s
    Dec(J2000) = +52d 44' 00"
with an uncertainty of 1.2 arcmin, (radius, sys+stat, 90% containment).
The partial coding was 89%.

This trigger followed that of GRB 140311A by only about 9 minutes, which led
to a complication in recording the photon-event data.  Only 3 seconds of
photon-event data was recorded, so no mask-weighted lightcurve is available.
T90 (15-350 keV) is estimated to be 70 +- 10 sec.  The burst had multiple
peaks.  Peak emission occurred about 15 seconds after the trigger time.

The time-averaged spectrum for the limited range of data available (about
5% of T90) from T+0 to T+3 sec is best fit by a simple power-law model.  The
power law index of the time-averaged spectrum is 1.12 +- 0.15 (90% confidence).
Because of the lack of event data, the fluence is not available.  Based on an
eye-ball estimate comparing the non-maskweighted lightcurve to those of other
bursts with a similar partial coding, the fluence in the 15-150 keV band was on
the order of several times 10^-6 ergs/cm^2
Looking for U.S. government information and services? Visit